Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Date
Msg-id 3c1cf991-8846-9a6f-c669-e21f8ea9a6a4@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 07/16/2018 08:01 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>
> I doubt as well that we'd be able to catch all the holes as well as the
> conditions where the optimization could be run safely are rather
> basically impossible to catch beforehand.  I'd like to vote for getting
> rid of this optimization for COPY, this can hurt more than it is
> helpful.  Per the lack of complaints, this could happen only in HEAD?


Well, we'd be getting rid of it because of a danger of data loss which 
we can't otherwise mitigate. Maybe it does need to be backpatched, even 
if we haven't had complaints.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Next
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: PG 10: could not generate random cancel key