Re: On partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: On partitioning
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZTzAk136aLg=qAFhUFhPk4TC=T3oGV21R2Jpn7HHVApA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: On partitioning  ("Amit Langote" <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I think you are right.  I think in this case we need something similar
>> to column pg_index.indexprs which is of type pg_node_tree(which
>> seems to be already suggested by Robert). So may be we can proceed
>> with this type and see if any one else has better idea.
>
> Yeah, with that, I was thinking we may be able to do something like dump a Node that describes the range partition
boundsor list of allowed values (say, RangePartitionValues, ListPartitionValues).
 

That's exactly what the kind of thing I was thinking about.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: On partitioning
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes