On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 2:18 PM Ilia Evdokimov
<ilya.evdokimov@tantorlabs.com> wrote:
> With such example, it's hard to disagree with it. This would really add
> valuable information. Taking all opinions into account, I have updated
> the patch v8. I have also included a check for the case where there are
> only zeros after the decimal point. We do not want to clutter the rows
> with unnecessary zeros.
I disagree. We don't do this for any other fractional value we print
in any other part of the system, and I do not think this case should
be some kind of weird exception.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
