On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> On 06/26/2015 03:40 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Actually, I've seen a number of presentations indicating
>> that the pacing of checkpoints is already too aggressive near the
>> beginning, because as soon as we initiate the checkpoint we have a
>> storm of full page writes. I'm sure we can come up with arbitrarily
>> complicated systems to compensate for this, but something simple might
>> be to calculate progress done+adjust/total+adjust rather than
>> done/total. If you let adjust=total/9, for example, then you
>> essentially start the progress meter at 10% instead of 0%. Even
>> something that simple might be an improvement.
>
> Yeah, but that's an unrelated issue. This was most recently discussed at
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKHd5Ce-bnD=gEEdtXiT2_AY7shquTKd0yHXXk5F4zVEKRPX-w@mail.gmail.com.
> I posted a simple patch there - review and testing is welcome ;-).
Ah, thanks for the pointer - I had forgotten about that thread.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
