On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Anyway, I won't stand in the way of the patch as long as it's modified
> to limit the number of values considered for any one character position
> to something reasonably small.
I think that limit in both the old and new code is 1, except that the
new code does it more efficiently.
Am I confused?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company