On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 11:09 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Names don't match here. I prefer _CONTINUE. As for the general one,
> I'm on the fence about INTERRUPT_GENERAL_WAKEUP, since wakeups aren't
> necessarily involved, but I don't have a specific better idea so I'm
> not objecting... Perhaps it's more like INTERRUPT_GENERAL_NOTIFY,
> except that _NOTIFY is already a well known thing, and the procsignal
> patch introduces INTERRUPT_NOTIFY...
INTERRUPT_GENERAL with no third word isn't out of the question, either.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
