Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZC0r6CeStjEV9z=axTmH-d+mXX2qRUkTwoSWSs6HS_hw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup  (Kashif Zeeshan <kashif.zeeshan@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 9:46 AM Kashif Zeeshan <kashif.zeeshan@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Does it fail to clean up the backup folder in all cases where the
backup failed, or just in this case?
The cleanup is done in the cases I have seen so far with base pg_basebackup functionality (not including the parallel backup feature) with the message "pg_basebackup: removing contents of data directory"
A similar case was also fixed for parallel backup reported by Rajkumar where the contents of the backup folder were not cleaned up after the error.

What I'm saying is that it's unclear whether there's a bug here or whether it just failed because of the very extreme test scenario you created. Spawning >1000 processes on a small machine can easily make a lot of things fail. 

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - add \aset to store results of a combined query
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL usage calculation patch