Re: Eager aggregation, take 3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Eager aggregation, take 3
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZAmuHqja8Y8g7beekTgt2TsmW+tnw9+c7GOikPR+KGYQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Eager aggregation, take 3  (Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 11:30 PM Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here’s a comparison of Execution Time and Planning Time for the seven
> queries with eager aggregation disabled versus enabled (best of 3).
>
> Execution Time:
>
>         EAGER-AGG-OFF           EAGER-AGG-ON
>
> q4      105787.963 ms           34807.938 ms
> q8      1407.454 ms             1654.923 ms
> q11     67899.213 ms            18670.086 ms
> q23     45945.849 ms            42990.652 ms
> q31     10463.536 ms            10244.175 ms
> q33     2186.928 ms             2217.228 ms
> q77     2360.565 ms             2416.674 ms

Could you attach the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output for these queries, with
and without the patch?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Alias of VALUES RTE in explain plan
Next
From: Nikita Malakhov
Date:
Subject: Re: detoast datum into the given buffer as a optimization.