Re: New WAL record to detect the checkpoint redo location - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: New WAL record to detect the checkpoint redo location
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ7wQZMz02FHe+074rE+kO-WFLpRpEqEse5Y4vNmz+qhw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New WAL record to detect the checkpoint redo location  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 3:27 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> I have looked at 0001, for now..  And it looks OK to me.

Cool. I've committed that one. Thanks for the review.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Pro et contra of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Pro et contra of preserving pg_proc oids during pg_upgrade