Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ6YDzuCQ8TdEh+ehFmiweb=v1dNK2USj-av-9wSwZ3Pg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The SELECT INTO tests all fail, but we know the reason why (the testbed
> isn't expecting them to result in creating separate entries for the
> utility statement and the underlying plannable SELECT).

This might be a dumb idea, but for a quick hack, could we just rig
SELECT INTO, CREATE TABLE AS, and EXPLAIN not to create entries for
themselves at all, without suppressing creation of an entry for the
underlying query?  The output might be slightly misleading but it
wouldn't be broken, and I'm disinclined to want to spend a lot of time
doing fine-tuning right now.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Command Triggers patch v18