On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 2:10 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> I have one question related to this; Why don't we use log_timezone,
> like backup_label? log_timezone is used for "START TIME" field in
> backup_label. Sorry if this was already discussed.
>
> /* Use the log timezone here, not the session timezone */
> stamp_time = (pg_time_t) time(NULL);
> pg_strftime(strfbuf, sizeof(strfbuf),
> "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z",
> pg_localtime(&stamp_time, log_timezone));
>
> OTOH, *if* we want to use the same timezone for backup-related files because
> backup can be used in different environements and timezone setting
> may be different there or for other reasons, backup_label also should use
> GMT or something for the sake of consistency?
It's a good question. My inclination was to think that GMT would be
the clearest thing, but I also didn't realize that the result would
thus be inconsistent with backup_label. Not sure what's best here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
