Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new nodetypes added by partitioning supp - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new nodetypes added by partitioning supp
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ5Rhppi9UdoMBbKOAJmN=508eM6=bekzzFr8ZHANcvig@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new nodetypes added by partitioning supp  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new node types added by partitioning supp  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> > I'm not really for doing it that way, but I'm willing to apply the fix
>> > if there's consensus for your position.  Anybody else have an opinion?
>>
>> I tend to agree with Noah on this one.
>
> +1

+1 from me, too.  I don't see that there's enough advantage in
avoiding a catversion bump to justify leaving this footgun behind.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was:Declarative partitioning - another take)
Next
From: Mithun Cy
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.