Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new node types added by partitioning supp - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new node types added by partitioning supp
Date
Msg-id 10367.1496151717@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new nodetypes added by partitioning supp  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> I'm not really for doing it that way, but I'm willing to apply the fix
>>>> if there's consensus for your position.  Anybody else have an opinion?

> +1 from me, too.  I don't see that there's enough advantage in
> avoiding a catversion bump to justify leaving this footgun behind.

The consensus seems pretty clear.  I'll make it so.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions