[HACKERS] Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was:Declarative partitioning - another take) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject [HACKERS] Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was:Declarative partitioning - another take)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYE+uuVBUv39bpw+N556joOZQ_mv9hB6V_kNDKOQv7xWw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was:Declarative partitioning - another take)  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update.  Kindly send
> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> update.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

I spoke with Kevin about this at PGCon and asked him to have a look at
it.  He agreed to do so, but did not specify a time frame, which seems
important.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_resetwal is broken if run from v10 against olderversion of PG data directory
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Code review focused on new nodetypes added by partitioning supp