On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> I'm not sure what you're arguing for here.
>
> Robert wants perfection, of course ;-). As do we all. But there are
> only so many hours in the day, and rejiggering pg_dump's rules about
> how to dump PLs is just way down the to-do list. I'm going to go do
> something with more tangible benefit, like see if we can make its
> REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW commands come out at the right time.
+1 to all of that. I'm only arguing that there's a difference between
the things that are worth fixing and the things that are formally
bugs. This may not be worth fixing, but I think it's formally a bug,
because you could easily expect it to work and there's no user-facing
documentation anywhere that says it doesn't. However, I'm no doubt
about the relative priority of this vs. the other issue you mention.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
