Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [doc fix] Correct calculation of vm.nr_hugepages - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [doc fix] Correct calculation of vm.nr_hugepages
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ3r84RjRiYhLNf4n9OzgNYCxpKTodNP_1mu+dbBTU1EA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: [doc fix] Correct calculation of vm.nr_hugepages  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: [doc fix] Correct calculation of vm.nr_hugepages
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Thanks, I'd like to take this.

Why are these values so large?  The example in the documentation shows
6490428 kB, and in my test I got 8733888 kB.  But 8733888 kB = 8.3 TB!
 8.3 GB would make sense, but 8.3 TB does not.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Typo in predicate.c comment
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Avoid valgrind complaint about write() of uninitalized bytes.