Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ3=8XzX8sC429XCaYvYcLw=f6z6yUogrfBbnK-VdV_hA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Responses Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
> I don't think we need both array_offset and array_offset_start; can't both
> SQL functions just call one C function?

Not if you want the opr_sanity tests to pass.

(But I'm seriously starting to wonder if that's actually a smart rule
for us to be enforcing.  It seems to be something of a pain in the
neck, and I'm unclear as to whether it is preventing any real
problem.)

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: moving from contrib to bin
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: moving from contrib to bin