[pgsql-pkg-debian] Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus buildfailure on s390x - Mailing list pgsql-pkg-debian

From Robert Haas
Subject [pgsql-pkg-debian] Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus buildfailure on s390x
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ1z6Lpp0FZ_GZqXTs9J+wKfm17kixVC_4eCriwYgPb6Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus build failure on s390x  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-pkg-debian
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> It'd be interesting if people could gather similar numbers on other
> platforms of more real-world relevance, such as ppc64.  But based on
> this small sample, I wouldn't object to just going to -fPIC across
> the board.

That seems pretty sensible to me.  I think we should aim for a
configuration that works by default.  If we use -fPIC where -fpic
would have been better, the result is that on some platforms there
might be a speed penalty, probably small.  In the reverse situation,
the build fails.  I believe that the average PostgreSQL extension
developer will prefer the first situation.  If somebody has got an
extension which is small enough to use -fpic and that person cares
about minimizing the performance penalty on s390 or other platforms
where they have this problem, then they can arrange an override in the
opposite direction.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-pkg-debian by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-pkg-debian] [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus build failure on s390x
Next
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: [pgsql-pkg-debian] Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] relocation truncated to fit: citus buildfailure on s390x