Re: problems with making relfilenodes 56-bits - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: problems with making relfilenodes 56-bits
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ1aJqjFpCM=3Peah=g3Oq=A=8nevcfL3ZeSa4HC7bskA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: problems with making relfilenodes 56-bits  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: problems with making relfilenodes 56-bits
Re: problems with making relfilenodes 56-bits
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 5:16 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have also executed my original test after applying these patches on
> top of the 56 bit relfilenode patch.  So earlier we saw the WAL size
> increased by 11% (66199.09375 kB to 73906.984375 kB) and after this
> patch now the WAL generated is 58179.2265625.  That means in this
> particular example this patch is reducing the WAL size by 12% even
> with the 56 bit relfilenode patch.

That's a very promising result, but the question in my mind is how
much work would be required to bring this patch to a committable
state?

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] Logical replica crash if there was an error in a function.
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Startup process on a hot standby crashes with an error "invalid memory alloc request size 1073741824" while replaying "Standby/LOCK" records