Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ+jgzR9XETuopFcBJij=3nO17t3YctLS9VaM+qm2hfUA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> OTOH, it seems quite likely that we'll add more transaction-lifetime
> shared data (e.g. combocid), so building per-xact infrastructure
> actually seems like a good idea.

Sure, but there's no urgency about it.  Particularly if the first cut
at this is implemented using dshash, moving the dshash to a different
DSA with a different lifespan later should be easy.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
Next
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #15009: connection to server