Re: add_partial_path() may remove dominated path but still in use - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: add_partial_path() may remove dominated path but still in use
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYyxBgkfN_APBdxdutFMukb=P-EgGNY-NbauRcL7mGnmA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: add_partial_path() may remove dominated path but still in use  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@heterodb.com>)
Responses Re: add_partial_path() may remove dominated path but still in use  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 9:10 PM Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@heterodb.com> wrote:
> 2019年1月11日(金) 5:52 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 12:44 AM Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@heterodb.com> wrote:
> > > So, is it sufficient if set_rel_pathlist_hook is just relocated in
> > > front of the generate_gather_paths?
> > > If we have no use case for the second hook, here is little necessity
> > > to have the post_rel_pathlist_hook() here.
> > > (At least, PG-Strom will use the first hook only.)
> >
> > +1.  That seems like the best way to be consistent with the principle
> > that we need to have all the partial paths before generating any
> > Gather paths.
> >
> Patch was updated, just for relocation of the set_rel_pathlist_hook.
> Please check it.

Seems reasonable to me.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Misleading panic message in backend/access/transam/xlog.c
Next
From: Andreas Karlsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature: temporary materialized views