Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYybNv-DdhVPMxLB2nx2SqeNJirtWHmdEAZUCGoTB2VBg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connectioncounts  ("Rady, Doug" <radydoug@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() forlarger connection counts  ("Rady, Doug" <radydoug@amazon.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Rady, Doug <radydoug@amazon.com> wrote:
> This patch enables building pgbench to use ppoll() instead of select()
>
> to allow for more than (FD_SETSIZE - 10) connections.  As implemented,
>
> when using ppoll(), the only connection limitation is system resources.

So what's an example of something that fails without this patch but
works with the patch?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Transform for pl/perl
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Process variadic arguments consistently injson functions