Re: Multi-column distinctness. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Multi-column distinctness.
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYyEjNa+3rjKA2nK9tziwh-FvaVRpc7cmciz3Jv7n-wXQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multi-column distinctness.  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Multi-column distinctness.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Koyotaro's changes to force COLUMN to be required won't get through.
>>
>> ISTM that we could use COLLECT STATISTICS instead of ADD STATISTICS, and
>> use REMOVE STATISTICS instead of DROP STATISTICS. That way we can use
>> ALTER TABLE rather than inventing a new command. 5 minute change...
>
> That seems like a neat idea, actually. I'm not sure COLLECT is a good choice
> as it suggest the statistics is actually built, but that only happens during
> ANALYZE. But otherwise this seems to solve the issues with keywords and it's
> quite simple.

But ADD is no better there.  I think ALTER TABLE .. COLLECT STATISTICS
isn't any worse than ALTER TABLE ... CLUSTER ON index_name.  In both
cases, it means, when you do this operation, do it this way.

I would suggest that instead of DROP or REMOVE, the opposite should be
ALTER TABLE .. NO COLLECT STATISTICS.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: ROWS FROM(): A Foolish (In)Consistency?
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: ROWS FROM(): A Foolish (In)Consistency?