Re: [HACKERS] tab completion for partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] tab completion for partitioning
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYwWiFCaEcG3+L5NYO_U=Ur1FNy7cdMSK_KMqaovga0yA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] tab completion for partitioning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Thanks for taking a look.  Hm, I think the second part seems to be
> needless duplication.  So, I changed it to match using TailMatches2("FOR",
> "VALUES") and kept just one instance of it.  The first part is matching
> and completing two different commands (ATTACH PARTITION partition_name and
> PARTITION OF parent_name), so that seems fine.

I agree.  Committed this version.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [patch] reorder tablespaces in basebackup tar streamfor backup_label
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation