Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYvO3cVcG6dwjX=9+vHTd0RHJk5NCv-Abn1zseuixuzJg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> Is anyone working on SET PERSISTENT?  I thought that got bike-shedded to
> death.

I think we had a fairly good sketch of how it could work mapped out,
mostly based around adding a postgresql.auto file.  I could dig up the
old discussions, if need be.

Basically, I'd be willing to get that implemented and bull it through
to completion in time for 9.2 if having that would make it easier for
everyone to accept the idea of turning the recovery.conf parameters
into GUCs.  Otherwise I probably will not get to it this cycle.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem