On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:44 AM, amit sehas <cun23@yahoo.com> wrote:
> It seems that the task of fetching next n results without moving the cursor seems like too complicated to implement
forany query that has
> even a little bit of complication in it...
I think that's probably true. It would also be expensive if you did
implement it; who wants to go re-execute a join to back up the scan?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
