Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] SortSupport for macaddr type - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] SortSupport for macaddr type
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYsO65uHCFW2yiRiqXn7_J+8daAQKJEYgpsLJgkWZ7S_A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] SortSupport for macaddr type  (Brandur Leach <brandur@mutelight.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Brandur Leach <brandur@mutelight.org> wrote:
> * I've been generating a new OID value with the
>   `unused_oids` script, but pretty much every time I rebase
>   I collide with someone else's addition and need to find a
>   new one. Is it better for me to pick an OID in an exotic
>   range for my final patch, or that a committer just finds
>   a new one (if necessary) as they're putting it into
>   master?

It's nice if you can do it before the committer gets to it, but if it
ends up conflicting I personally don't find fixing it to be a big
deal.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Small issue in online devel documentationbuild
Next
From: Maksim Milyutin
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table