Re: patch for parallel pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYrioQ+av0coNy+w=p=02Rvu-W__vjidsw-ZmKU96sU5A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: patch for parallel pg_dump  (Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>)
Responses Re: patch for parallel pg_dump  (Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de> wrote:
>> So we at least need to press on far enough to get to that point.
>
> Sure, let me know if I can help you with something.

Alright.  I think (hope) that I've pushed this far enough to serve the
needs of parallel pg_dump.  The error handling is still pretty grotty
and might need a bit more surgery to handle the parallel case, but I
think that making this actually not ugly will require eliminating the
Archive/ArchiveHandle distinction, which is probably a good thing to
do but, as you point out, maybe not the first priority right now.

Can you provide an updated patch?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jay Levitt
Date:
Subject: Re: Designing an extension for feature-space similarity search
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: possible new option for wal_sync_method