Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYq6QxUnhDsgS6ygAwv3=7ikf_c_87Xh9g7xe5+43qE9A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 12:11 PM Mark Dilger
<mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> A superuser-only GUC for this is also a bit too heavy handed.

Yeah, but you're inventing a system for allowing the restriction on a
GUC to be something other than is-superuser in the very patch we're
talking about. So it could be something like is-database-security.
Therefore I don't grok the objection.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Followup Timestamp to timestamp with TZ conversion
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)