Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYorYFaQQZ5FWqYS0rp5mtC=cvMr4mBgTnVAg1PXSuFOg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Per your other email, here's the patch again; hopefully I've got the
>> right stuff in the file this time.
>
> Your patch looks fine to me. I recommend committing patch 1 with these
> additions. I can't think of any reason to rehash the 2012 discussion.

I've committed the patch I posted yesterday.  I did not see a good
reason to meld that together in a single commit with the first of the
patches you posted; I'll leave you to revise that patch to conform
with this approach.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: James Cloos
Date:
Subject: Re: PostrgeSQL vs oracle doing 1 million sqrts am I doing it wrong?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: missing PG_RETURN_UINT16