On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote:
> (This does rather suggest to me that some better regression tests for
> sorting would be a good idea, possibly even including on-disk sorts.)
Yeah. I've been unpleasantly surprised by how easy it is to pass the
regression tests with sorting broken.
> >> If you're determined to go this route - over my protest - then you
> >> need to do something like define a NumericAbbrevGetDatum(x) macro
> >> and use it in place of the Int64GetDatum / Int32GetDatum ones for
> >> both NAN and the return from numeric_abbrev_convert_var.
>
> Robert> Patch for that attached.
>
> That looks reasonable, though I think it could do with a comment
> explaining _why_ it's defining its own macros rather than using
> Int32*/Int64*. (And I wrote that before seeing Tom's message, even.)
Agreed. I have added that and committed this.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
