On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 8:32 PM Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agree, that performance won't be a problem, but that will be bit confusing
> to the user. As at the start user providing the manifest-checksum (assume
> that user-provided CRC32C) and at the end, user will find the SHA256
> checksum string in the backup_manifest file.
I don't think that's particularly confusing. The documentation should
say that this is the algorithm to be used for checksumming the files
which are backed up. The algorithm to be used for the manifest itself
is another matter. To me, it seems far MORE confusing if the algorithm
used for the manifest itself is magically inferred from the algorithm
used for one of the File lines therein.
> Does this also means that irrespective of whether user provided a checksum
> option or not, we will be always generating the checksum for the backup_manifest file?
Yes, that is what I am proposing.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
