Re: [HACKERS] More race conditions in logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] More race conditions in logical replication
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYmndXxtYhFgOJydv0K5FJN_Q0jeafLfY-+BP4S2ZZ=-A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] More race conditions in logical replication  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] More race conditions in logical replication  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> BTW, I noticed that the PG_WAIT_LOCK value that we're using for wait
> event here (and in the replication slot case) is bogus.  We probably
> need something new here.

Yeah, if you're adding a new wait point, you should add document a new
constant in the appropriate section, probably something under
PG_WAIT_IPC in this case.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More race conditions in logical replication
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Subscription code improvements