On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> Quite a lot of thought seems to have gone into making the
> fd.c/resowner mechanism leak-proof in the face of errors. So, quite
> apart from what that approaches misses out on, I really don't want to
> change resource management too much. As I went into in my "recap", it
> seems useful to change as little as possible about temp files.
I think this is just wishful thinking. resowners are backend-private,
and they are robust as long as they are managing files accessed by a
single backend. Trying to bend them into some kind of a state where
they can manage a resource shared across multiple cooperating backends
is fundamentally changing the model. What matters is not whether the
old model was any good but whether the new one is any good.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
