Re: pg_dump broken for non-super user - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_dump broken for non-super user
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYm-+6=dfjHJCO9DqshhjK8GhcUSUH=RQ+-sqzj3oZTZg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump broken for non-super user  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: pg_dump broken for non-super user
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> * Craig Ringer (craig@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
>> On 3 May 2016 at 19:04, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > With commit a9f0e8e5a2e779a888988cb64479a6723f668c84, now pg_dump, use a
>> > bitmap
>> > to represent what to include. With this commit if non-super user is unable
>> > to perform the dump.
>> >
>>
>> Hm. I think we need a src/bin/pg_dump/t/ test for the TAP suite for this
>> one, because something this fundamental should really have blown the
>> buildfarm up when committed.
>
> I'm in the process of building a pretty comprehensive set, as discussed
> in another thread.

Are you going to review and commit this patch?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump broken for non-super user
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump broken for non-super user