Re: ATT_FOREIGN_TABLE and ATWrongRelkindError() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: ATT_FOREIGN_TABLE and ATWrongRelkindError()
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYgKzeOqvR5+JhzdWJYMU2CEXBySRcTogrvupxxJadjgA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ATT_FOREIGN_TABLE and ATWrongRelkindError()  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2015/10/23 19:02, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2015/10/23 18:51, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>>
>>> This is really really nitpicking, but I noticed that there is an implicit
>>> rule concerning the message format in ATWrongRelkindError; if more than
>>> two objects are present, the message is "\"%s\" is not a foo, bar, or
>>> baz". ("or" is preceded by a comma!)  So, would it be better that the
>>> former is "\"%s\" is not a table, view, or foreign table"?
>>
>> Oops! Yeah, I missed the comma there. That seems like a generally
>> preferred punctuation rule (the comma before conjunction(s) I mean).
>
> Here is a patch rectifying that mistake.

Committed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Add EXTRA_CFLAGS to configure
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench gaussian/exponential docs improvements