On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 11:34 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not planning on pushing this any further. I've just tried to
> highlight that there's the possibility of a behavioural change. You're
> claiming there isn't one. I claim there is.
I don't know what to tell you. The original version of the patch
didn't change this stuff, and the result did not work. So I looked
into the problem and fixed it. I may have done that wrongly, or there
may be debatable points, but it seems like your argument is
essentially that I shouldn't have done any of this and I should just
take it all back out, and I know that doesn't work because it's the
first thing I tried.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
