Re: [HACKERS] Passing query string to workers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Passing query string to workers
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYfYwyeat5=p4u6Vn52b3inL6H96P+CD8batgfuF6vjOA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Passing query string to workers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Passing query string to workers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> As far as reproducing the pg_stat_activity query goes, you could probably
>>> grab that string out of the master backend's pgstat entry and pass it over
>>> at parallel query start.  But please don't confuse it with either
>>> debug_query_string or the string referenced by the QueryDesc; I do not
>>> think there's any guarantee that those are the same.
>
>> I think we should pass only the string referenced by the QueryDesc to
>> the worker, and on the worker side report that via debug_query_string
>> and pg_stat_activity and attach it to the QueryDesc itself.  Is that
>> also your view?
>
> That would work, if you had a way to get at the active QueryDesc ...
> but we don't pass that down to executor nodes.

Hmm, that is a bit of a problem.  Do you have a suggestion?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash