Re: Parallel sec scan in plpgsql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Parallel sec scan in plpgsql
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYegNkjRt=WuGc5r+dfBh8gr+dn7t9mrg3Nnu9MeLhO4g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel sec scan in plpgsql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Maybe it would be better to fix the rule against workers
> invoking their own parallel queries.

That rule does have the advantage of preventing us from having one
user backend launch N^2 workers.  I don't think it would be that much
work to fix it, but the results might be pretty exciting.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel sec scan in plpgsql
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of SizeOfIptrData - is that obsolete?