Re: Anti join confusion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Anti join confusion
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYeU8oA+s7h68r6C+NM=WkbXTee9ffR5tXymRLYGuoO8Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Anti join confusion  (wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 8:08 AM wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com> wrote:
>     Actually ,Many fork postgresql databases have already implemented ,For example, if the relevant field has a
non-nullconstraint ,Many databases can do the same thing as not exist ( MySQL ,SQL Server,Oracle) 

I'm not surprised to hear it. Long-time PostgreSQL users just don't
use NOT IN, so it's fine, but anyone coming from another database gets
hosed. I think it would be good to put some effort into improving this
area, but I do not have time to work on it myself.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Benoit Lobréau
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix logging for invalid recovery timeline
Next
From: Sagar Shedge
Date:
Subject: Re: Extend postgres_fdw_get_connections to return remote backend pid