On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> It feels weird to me that the new columns are called transactionid and
>> xmin. Why not xid and xmin?
>
> Actually the part of that that bothers me is "xmin", which conflicts
> with a reserved system column name. While you can legally pick such
> conflicting names for view columns, it's not going to be so much fun
> when you try to join that view against some regular table.
That's a fair point, too. So maybe we should go with something like
backend_xid and backend_xmin or some other prefix that we come up
with. My concern is more that I think they should be consistent
somehow.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
