Re: [PATCH] Add EXPLAIN (ALL) shorthand - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PATCH] Add EXPLAIN (ALL) shorthand
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYZqbH4raR9p22Se8SCQCi5zJOH8Fpwuki0=AFy6Ddvpw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Add EXPLAIN (ALL) shorthand  (Евгений Шишкин <itparanoia@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Add EXPLAIN (ALL) shorthand  (Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Евгений Шишкин <itparanoia@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 20 May 2016, at 01:12, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm a bit inclined to think that what this is really about is that we
>> made the wrong call on the BUFFERS option, and that it should default
>> to ON just like COSTS and TIMING do.  Yeah, that would be an incompatible
>> change, but that's what major releases are for no?
>
> After thinking about it, i think this is a better idea.

Hmm, my experience is different.  I use EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, VERBOSE) a
lot, but EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) only rarely.  I wonder if a GUC is
the way to go.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Request for Patch Feedback: Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions