On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> The second attached patch, to be applied after the first, removes the
>> existing checks of HasCTZSet in the backend. The only visible effect of
>> this, AFAICT, is that to_char's TZ format spec now delivers something
>> useful instead of an empty string when a brute-force timezone is in use.
>> I could be persuaded either way as to whether to back-patch this part.
>> From one standpoint, this to_char behavioral change is clearly a bug fix
>> --- but it's barely possible that somebody out there thought that
>> returning an empty string for TZ was actually the intended/desirable
>> behavior.
>
> Any opinions about whether to back-patch this part or not? It seems
> like a bug fix, but on the other hand, I don't recall any complaints
> from the field about to_char's TZ spec not working with brute-force zones.
> So maybe the prudent thing is to leave well enough alone.
I vote for leaving it alone until somebody complains.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
