Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Tuple-routing for certain partitioned tables notworking as expected - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Tuple-routing for certain partitioned tables notworking as expected
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYWuLVSEe0-m9fSBvEmOtCWqZk3nG2Qhw+ENd_MB1j=OQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Tuple-routing for certain partitioned tables notworking as expected  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Tuple-routing for certain partitioned tables notworking as expected  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 4:55 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Agreed, but I'd vote for fixing this in v10 as proposed; I agree that just
> ripping the CheckValidResultRel checks out entirely is not a good idea, but
> that seems OK to me at least as a fix just for v10.

I'm still not on-board with having this be the one case where we don't
do CheckValidResultRel.  If we want to still call it but pass down
some additional information that can selectively skip certain checks,
I could probably live with that.

At some point we've got to stop developing v10 and just let it be what it is.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery
Next
From: Christian Ullrich
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] visual studio 2017 build support