On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think BitmapHeapScan check whether dsa is valid or not if DSA is not
> valid then it should assume it's non-parallel plan.
>
> Attached patch should fix the issue.
So, create the pstate and then pretend we didn't? Why not just avoid
creating it in the first place, like this?
I haven't checked whether this fixes the bug, but if it does, we can
avoid introducing an extra branch in BitmapHeapNext.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
