On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2/26/17 11:46, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I don't see
>> a solution other than launching a separate worker for each database,
>> which seems like it could be extremely expensive if there are many
>> databases.
>
> You don't have to start all these workers at once. Starting one and not
> starting the next one until the first one is finished should be fine.
> It will have the same serial behavior that the patch is proposing anyway.
Yeah, true. The constant factor is higher, of course.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
