Re: [HACKERS] hash partitioning based on v10Beta2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] hash partitioning based on v10Beta2
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYRW6YuzpoLg7-BQLE23dt-yg-S7BfgLfHXyTf4tc=NRg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] hash partitioning based on v10Beta2  ("yangjie@highgo.com" <yangjie@highgo.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] hash partitioning based on v10Beta2  (yangjie <yangjie@highgo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:40 AM, yangjie@highgo.com <yangjie@highgo.com> wrote:
> A partition table can be create as bellow:
>
>  CREATE TABLE h1 PARTITION OF h;
>  CREATE TABLE h2 PARTITION OF h;
>  CREATE TABLE h3 PARTITION OF h;

This syntax is very problematic for reasons that have been discussed
on the existing hash partitioning thread.  Fortunately, a solution has
already been implemented... you're the third person to try to write a
patch for this feature.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pg_rewind: Fix some problems when copyingfiles >2GB.
Next
From: Ryan Murphy
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 1 test fails in make installcheck-world - database"regress_ecpg_user2" does not exist