On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Any objections? Anyone want to do further review?
>
>> LGTM. I think this is an improvement. However, it seems like it
>> might be a good idea for ResourceOwnerRememberBuffer and
>> ResourceOwnerForgetBuffer to Assert(buffer != NULL), so that if
>> somebody messes up it will trip an assertion rather than just seg
>> faulting.
>
> Uh, what? There are only a few callers of those, and they'd all have
> crashed already if they were somehow dealing with an invalid buffer.
Sorry, I meant Assert(owner != NULL).
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
