Re: Obsolete comment in tidpath.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Obsolete comment in tidpath.c
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYQN00XB9HJnGNPx7HtSi9f9anTakXxJxK9Wgq_5Y1F2Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Obsolete comment in tidpath.c  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Obsolete comment in tidpath.c  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I think "best_inner_indexscan()" in the following comment in tidpath.c
> is obsolete.
>
>  * There is currently no special support for joins involving CTID; in
>  * particular nothing corresponding to best_inner_indexscan().  Since it's
>  * not very useful to store TIDs of one table in another table, there
>  * doesn't seem to be enough use-case to justify adding a lot of code
>  * for that.
>
> How about s/best_inner_indexscan()/parameterized scans/?

I'm not sure that's altogether clear.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual