Re: 9.2 release notes, beta time? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: 9.2 release notes, beta time?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYQFcDdYx-6mmZQQqCukKyGw+rd3nPZ-FU9ccHf5OJh7g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.2 release notes, beta time?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 9.2 release notes, beta time?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: 9.2 release notes, beta time?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> I had hoped to complete the release notes by March 30, but travel and
>> catching up on old stuff has delayed that.  I will start working on them
>> now and have them ready before we start beta.  If that is a problem,
>> please let me know.
>
> Well, we aren't ready for beta today anyway, AFAICT.
>
> Would it be reasonable to shoot for wrapping 9.2beta1 next week?
> (That would mean a wrap on Thursday May 3, if we follow the usual
> type of release schedule.)

I suspect that's a bit aggressive.  We have a couple of issues that I
think we should fix before beta1:

- the pg_stat_statements cleanups we were discussing on the other
thread, since that's going to involve changing column names/types
- the Hot Standby vs. index-only scans stuff, which needs a WAL format
change, and is my top priority as soon as I get unburied
- SP-GiST is unsafe for use by hot standby slaves, since I think
queries returning wrong answers = bad
- http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1333124720-sup-6193@alvh.no-ip.org

I'm not sure we can commit to a timeline for beta until we know who is
taking care of each of those things.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.2 release notes, beta time?
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.2 release notes, beta time?